The FBI ran a child porn site to catch predators, and now the accused are crying foul

When ____ ____ ____ logged into a large child pornography website and downloaded images using his work computer, he was charged with receipt and possession of child pornography.

The operator of the website that was exploiting children, however, was not arrested.

That’s because it was the FBI. And federal prosecutors are defending the agency’s decision to secretly hijack and peddle child porn for two weeks as part of a sting operation. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The FBI victimized those kids as much, if not more, than those who downloaded the images from the FBI site as they had more images, more child porn, than anyone who visited the website. Those who went to the site should be charged for downloading the images, but even more so, everyone at the FBI who participated in this should be charged with distribution of child pornography.

I figure based on the recent past Supreme Court ruling, the FBI owes Each kid a large Sum of Money for Each picture/video.

I have heard stories about government agency task forces running similar sites for months. Anyone who justifies overstepping legal boundaries in favor of catching the bad guys is as bad, if not worse than the bad guys. Taking it to the next level isn’t as far fetched as people might believe. Using the middle east as an example the United States has tribal leader allies that openly have sex with prepubescent children in and around US military bases or at least in ear shot of US soldiers. The soldiers complain to commanders and the commanders say shut up if we want the assistance of these people we must let them go about their customs. Yet other clear human rights violations are criticized and fought because the people doing them are our enemies. So if a story ever surfaces that a government agency ran a sex trafficking operation don’t be surprised that they did it, be shocked it took them that long to justify doing it for the greater good.

Im pretty sure this was not the first sting they ran. Try 2005-6….I sure wish someone would find out and we could beat City Hall…so to speak.